M-Series.com First Drive Review: 2013 BMW M6 Coupe

August 29, 2012

Over the years we’ve harped on the previous generation M6 a ton here at BimmerFile. From its lackluster chassis dynamics to the questionable “power” button the E63 M6 wasn’t M’s finest moment. That said BMW’s moved on and so have we with turbo power and a focus on broadening appeal while creating better all-around cars. But does the all new 2013 BMW M6 buck that trend?

We recently spent a day at the famed Laguna Seca Raceway in Monterey, California with the M6. Our goal was simple; see if it is worthy of running the corkscrew rather than just transporting one to a dinner party.

Truth be told, we had low expectations going into this track test as the last M6 was such a let down to us (outside that godly V10) and Laguna Seca is a technical track better served by light agile machines rather than 4,200 lbs grand tourers. One thing is for certain, without ever looking at a spec sheet, starting an engine or sitting in the driver’s seat, this car looks faster than almost any BMW before it.

It flicks all the right switches to get our hearts racing just on the possibility of performance based on the aggressive exterior. And that double bubble Zagato ‘esque carbon roof looks even more amazing and aggressive in real life.

Engine

 

With 560 ponies just ready to let loose and 500 torques to go along with them, this all new M6 should not be looked down upon because the engine doesn’t have a racing lineage. The dual twin scrolled turbocharged reverse flow aluminum V8 is as close to naturally aspirated as can be found in the land of forced induction.

That is due in no small part to the patented intake manifold that keeps the engine’s exhaust pulses and turbo spools in perfect harmony. Rather than individual throttle bodies that disturb air flow and add turbulence the S63tü utilizes BMW’s Valvetronic system which uses valve lift as the throttle bodies; increasing combustion efficiency and precision. Not to leave anything out in terms of engine tech, M added in direct injection and a rather robust engine management processor to make this engine an all around performer.

It is more powerful, more efficient and easier to live with day-to-day than the former V10, so what’s not to like? If we’re honest there is one thing. It’s not the turbo-charging that bother us nor the throaty sound that barks on lift off but having to train one’s right foot to be a lot smoother on power delivery. There’s so much power and the delivery is so instantaneous that it’s easy to break things loose.

Thanks to increased engine efficiency and a larger fuel tank the highway range has increased by 34%, which means the M6 can now get from Munich to the ‘Ring on a single tank of super- a pipe dream in the past. Stop light racers will rejoice with the usually conservative BMW 0-60 time of 4.1 seconds- sub 4 seconds will be laid down by one of those glossy car publications in short order, without the use of any afterburners.

Transmission

 

The 7 speed M Dual Clutch Transmission used in the M6 is derived from the current generation M3 but is given a dose of PEDs to handle the added torque and has software improvements that aid in low speed situations. It is a huge step up in street driving compared to the previous generation’s Sequential Manual Gearbox III, it almost feels like a torque converter automatic.

On the track with the Drivelogic at the maximum level it unleashes neck snapping gear changes that would be at home in a GT3 car racing around Europe let alone a luxurious boulevard cruiser. It matches revs and engages with little hesitation from the time the paddle is pulled. Rumor has it that a six speed manual (same as used in the US M5) will be offered later in the life cycle but even the staunchest manual defender will be hard pressed to find issue with the semi-auto in this application for track use.

Handling

 

BMW M has always stood behind the concept that their chassis dynamics are designed to be faster than the engine supplied, with the M6 this idea continues to ring true. With the typical adjustable M suspension the car easily goes from comfortable cruiser to a sporty canyon carver. The marketing people will tell you that the new rigid mounted rear is derived directly from racing. And there’s truth in that. BMW M took the rather surprising step of bolting the rear subframe directly to the chassis in a bid to improve dynamics. The result is a 4200 lbs car that seems to defy logic with it’s ability to feel quick whitted and more eager in the corners than expected. The M5 introduced this last year as the first non limited edition M car with this method of construction and the first to land in the US (the M3 GTS and CRT being the first two worldwide).

The near neutral handling and ability to transfer weight properly in such a large heavy car is nothing less than remarkable and far beyond the driving abilities of most that will be purchasing this car. Steering remains an M developed hydraulic servotronic unit which varies boost based on speed- its not as communicative as the M3 but compared to the EPS unit in the 6 it is nothing but pure bliss and can be adjusted for boost with the console mounted switch.

Getting all that power to the ground and keeping everything stuck to the pavement are the latest Michelin Pilot Super Sports (295s out back) which continue to impress even the staunchest critics with their stickiness, durability and ride comfort. The tires may have the final say as to what the car does for grip but the new Active M Differential can decide which of the rear tires gets the power. This is due to the integrated electronics that communicate with the Dynamic Stability Control system that then sends direct power where the grip is and to the outside wheel during cornering. The trick rear diff also is only active when its needed so fuel economy is less impacted than with the fully viscous system of the past.

For the first time in a long time we were hesitant to turn off all the nannies in a car. After getting comfortable in the driver seat and in the passenger seat with BMW Works driver Bill Auberlen (who is a master behind the wheel of cars and boats) it was very apparent that this M6 was a monster that required a lot to be tamed. Partly because of the weight, partly because of the technical nature of Laguna Seca, it was a daunting task to reel the M6 in. A word of warning, unexperienced drivers really need to take care behind the wheel when driving in anger with the new M6. There is a point with the M6 that is of no return and one better have the skills and cajones to get out of a self induced pickle.

We witnessed many an auto journalist drive beyond their own means and nearly hit things that did not move during our time at the track. During development there were several crashes that were caught by spies and even a late change in the aero package to improve the cars ability to remain on track. The car is more than capable on the track and quite safe in capably hands. But we are talking about a heavy powerful machine and the laws of physics, while seemingly defied by the engineers, still apply. Driving with DSC completely off required full concentration on weight transfer, throttle modulation and a good bit of our less preferred technique of left foot braking to get the most out of the car at the limit.

Another point to drive home here is that the M Dynamic Mode setting of DSC is the least invasive ever, allowing more tail out and wheel spinning shenanigans than even the 1M coupe. According to the trackside pros there is little in terms of lap time gains when the system is defeated as being smooth on this track means speed and from our experience that was spot on, not to mention it added a layer of security just in case we were a little too aggressive on the gas.

Brakes

 

We can’t talk about handling and track ability without discussing brakes. With all that power and weight being thrown around the binders need to be confidence inducing and have some spare muscle for those moments drivers exceed their own abilities, those we tested did just that. The caveat is the brakes we came to be enamored with were those that only exist in the future. Where is Doc’s DeLorean when it’s needed?

The optional 6 piston gold calipers with New York pizza sized carbon ceramic discs (16.1″) won’t be introduced until sometime in 2013 and cost around 10 large when the required 20″ wheels are added in. Can a set of brakes worth the price of a purpose built E36 race car? That’s a tough call but they are nothing less ridiculous. They allow significantly deeper braking in corners and NEVER experience any fade no matter how much abuse they are dealt. The rotors should last 100,000 miles before needing replacement under normal driving, with pads (which cost only slightly more than normal) lasting around 50,000 miles according to BMW.

The base brakes are the M compound brakes we tested on the M5 and M6 convertible. While they are adequate and a huge step up from the 550i, they can’t hold a candle to the carbon ceramics. Part of us wishes we had never driven the carbon setup as now our view of braking is completely jaded and nothing will ever meet expectations.

The blue painted calipers feature six pistons up front, a 15.7″ steel disc and an aluminum hat to reduce unsprung weight. Out back are single pistons clamping on 15.6″ discs. The steel system was good for a handful of laps before fade checked in, something that could be extended with pads and fluid designed for track use but something BMW doesn’t believe in for press launches as that is not how the cars are sold on showrooms (hat tip to them for being genuine).

Luxury

 

Luxurious accouterments with M seem to go hand in hand these days as the clientele has shifted from performance junkies to those that want a car that has it all- comfort, luxury and sport. The materials, textures and design of the M6 leave nothing to be less than luxurious. The real carbon fiber trim, to the full Merino leather are executed as well as, if not better than, cars costing more money and having less sporty intentions. M has made the M6 a dual personality car from a night at ballet to race circuit at the push of one of two steering wheel mounted M buttons.

Speaking of steering wheels, the all new M split three spoke wheel is a nod to the past while being more comfortable in the hand- it’s less bulky and just is more appropriate for a daily driver. Some may argue that all that leather and luxury do not belong in an M car, while on some level we agree there is target market for this car and they know what they want and they are willing to pay a premium for it. With only some 3,200 units of the last generation sold in the US it goes without saying that this is a niche vehicle and competes with cars costing far more that offer less performance and luxury- making the M6 somewhat of a bargain amongst the likes of Aston Martins and Jaguars.

With an option list full of the latest gadgetry from a Head Up Display and a futuristic B&O sound system to Full LED headlights there is everything the most particular buyer could want.

Conclusions

 

The new M6 is a revelation. A revelation that once again M has done the impossible and made a very heavy vehicle seemingly defy the laws of physics thanks to advanced chassis design and a monstrous powertrain. Make no mistake, the M6 is not a car we’d line up to buy unless we hit it big in a stock trade. But the fact is we’d actually buy this one if we could. That’s not an insignificant comment considering where our opinion was not that long ago with the E63.

While the car is still too heavy to be as agile and communicative as we’d prefer (significantly lighter cars from M are still a generation or two away as carbon becomes cheaper and more prevalent) it is now an aspirational offering we’d consider. Something that when the money comes in and a fast luxurious daily driver is in order. it’s on the top of the list. It’s worth repeating that. Even as BMW fans that’s a list that formerly only included exotics. The late addition of the Gurney lip spoiler also showed us that the engineers are clawing back and making cars that are designed to be driven rather than just looked at, which is what we’d hope from the likes of M rather than an outfit run by marketing and designers.

We’d be hard pressed to find any major areas of weakness outside of weight with this M6. Call us impressed.

Tech Specs and Full Gallery

 


BMWBLOG Comparison Test: 2012 BMW M5 vs 2012 Cadillac CTS-V

August 5, 2012

Posted: 03 Aug 2012 09:28 AM PDT

das

Smoke lingers in the air, slowly drifting across the sun-set scene. But it’s not tire smoke – it’s billowing out of the BBQ, this time a classic Bratwurst VS Johnsonville Brats cook-off. American meat vs German sausage. Well, you get the idea.

A lot more is at stake here than automotive best-in-class. The pride of a nation and its car culture rests upon the type of titanic competition that we have at hand. This is not sports car vs sports car; it’s the best Germany can offer vs the best America can muster. And it’s been a long time coming.

Launched in 1985, the BMW M5 has continuously set the high water-mark for what a sports sedan could be, indeed, should be. Hand-built and employing a supercar engine of the times, it was the fastest sedan the world knew in its first iteration, and every successive generation has earned that title – until now.

Many automakers have gone to great lengths to determine just what is in the German’s special BBQ sauce. What makes the M5 so spicy, so delectable, so… fast? Mercedes came to the cook-off with their AMG massaged E class, and – while this year it has finally turned up with the right flavor – it previously missed the mark (stand-by for an E63 AMG VS M5 Comparo – we know the Merc is on the war path and has already won some over). Audi and others have had a stab at the M5, but fell short. In 2004, Cadillac launched their first serious assault on the M5 in the form of the CTS-V. It too fell short. Not enough flavor, and the build quality left many with indigestion.

“Launched in 1985, the BMW M5 has continuously set the high water-mark for what a sports sedan could be…”

In 2009 Cadillac tried again, and this time the ingredients were just right for a proper comparison. Based on the GM Sigma II platform, the CTS-V gained weight, but also became a much more sophisticated, upscale sedan. Gone are the wayward interior moldings, squeaks and all. Reach out to touch the CTS-V’s interior surfaces and your hand will be rewarded with satisfying tactile sensations from the likes of real metals, better quality leathers, and plastics. The entire mood and aura has changed.

Of course, none of you are reading this article to hear how the interior build quality of the Cadillac compares to the BMW. The Germans are still a ways ahead in terms of fit and finish and use of quality materials, so if you’re looking for the better limo, buy the BMW. The heart of this comparison lies between the two cars’ performance, and equally important, how they feel to drive. Let’s get to it.

Walking up to the Cadillac, the car’s mysteriously alien yet organic lines are pleasing to the eye. Looks are subjective so I won’t delve in too deep here – but I must admit I am smitten by the Cadillac’s handsome looks. Every line intercepts the next just-right, creating a whole that’s greater than the sum of its individual lines and shapes. Even more important – the hood bulge, gaping wheel fenders and quad-exhaust are visual cues of the car’s immense 556 hp and 551 lb-ft of torque. Sitting idle, this car has a presence about it as you approach. You can’t help but feel a little bit excited to get inside and wiggle your toes over the pedals. In that respect, it is not so different from the M5.

Cadillac has nailed the seats – they are fantastic, holding you just right, such that you can dial in driver inputs with precision whilst fighting the G-force this car will create. As mentioned above, the interior of this car feels great – finally up to par with competition in the premium sport-luxury class. Is it best in class? Not by a long shot – but it gets the job done and leaves you saying, “yeah, that was $63,215 USD well spent” (as opposed to the previous car’s typical “great chassis… but what the *&%# did they do to the dash?” remark).

Fire up the 6.2 liter V8 and your ears will be tickled by a wonderful, sonorous hum. The American V8 is a soundfeast, unleashing glorious battle soundtracks as you get deeper into the throttle. It’s probably one of the best parts of this car – the way it sounds as it goes about its business.

“The American V8 is a soundfeast, unleashing glorious battle soundtracks…”

And getting down to business, just what does this Cadillac accomplish? Official factory 0-60 times are conservative; independent testing has managed sub 4 second 0-60 times – and that is bloody fast for any sports car, never mind a fully appointed 4 door luxury sedan. Cadillac claims a 179 mph top speed, and given this car’s power and slippery sheet-metal, we wouldn’t doubt it. But the numbers do not tell the whole story of this car’s performance. The Cadillac gets under your collar, it pokes you in uncomfortable places and whispers dares in your ear. It’s a bad-ass American thug, in that respect. And we like it for that – it hasn’t lost its focus on performance and fun, while it delivers you to your destination in comfort and class.

Most impressive is the Cadillac’s chassis. Ok, at 4,300 lbs it’s way too heavy, but overall weight aside, the CTS-V is a balanced, well-tuned sport sedan. Turn in is crisp and immediate, the front tires mating to the asphalt well as you get the nose to rotate in towards apex. The Cadillac does exhibit understeer, but it’s mild and easily negated several ways – from throttle lift-off to a good wallop of the right-most pedal. Thanks to the immediacy of the throttle response, the Cadillac is easy to balance on throttle at the limit, allowing you to put in quick lap times. In short, the Cadillac is a driver’s car. It demands your attention and quick hands on the wheel. It prods you and begs to go faster. It hits all the right buttons and if you can overlook the less than top-notch interior, it is a complete package – a four doored sports car. Of course, all the necessary trimmings are included, from a slick 6-speed manual to a LSD between the rear wheels.

“BMW’s M5 was born on the Nurburgring – and that’s not some hyped corporate salesy baloney tag-line…”

BMW’s M5 was born on the Nurburgring – and that’s not some hyped corporate salesy baloney tag-line. The M5 was actually born on the Nurburgring. The same arena every M car ever built was designed and tested. Don’t ever underestimate an M5. Ok, yes, it’s bloated to the size of a 7 series and weighs just shy of the Cadillac at 4,288 lbs of heft – but M has worked some kind of voodoo performance magic into the metallurgy of the M5′s skin, and once you’re off to trott on a racetrack, the M5′s bloodline shows through. It’s just fantastic – the harder you push the more the M5 rewards, and no matter its size and weight – it doesn’t tire out. After relentless lapping of Ascari racetrack, the M5 remained unflappable. All I ran out of was rear tire and fuel. Once the rears were replaced and the tank was filled, it just wanted more corners to conquer, or slide through. (For an in depth analysis of the M5′s track performance, hit the jump).

There is little difference in outright performance between these two. Yes, the M5 is a little quicker around most racetracks, and it does have more advanced technology on board – from its raging, twin-turbo’d engine to its directly-bolted rear sub-frame. If you are bent on winning a local time attack championship – buy the M5. If you’re not being timed to a tenth, then sit tight while we ponder what’s left between these two super-sedans.

There’s a linguistic adage, “What you say matters less than how you say it.” We can apply this truth here in automotive form, “performance numbers matter less than driving experience.” It’s true, the M5 can be one big, quiet, sedate – dare I say it – boring sedan. But at the flick of a steering wheel-mounted M button it can deliver the type of spine-tingling performance jollies that earned the original M5 its hallowed reputation. The Cadillac is at least as exciting as the M5. Where the M5 is more polished, more mature and grown-up, the Cadillac is a bit of a boy-racer. It is a little more ragged, requires a little more attention behind the wheel, and a little more bravery to run at 10/10ths pace. This is a two edged sword – to some a demerit, to others a merit.

In the sound department, the CTS-V lands a heavy blow. This car sounds awesome at any rpm, yet the soundtrack is never tiresome from behind the wheel. This, compared to the M5′s fake engine sounds: synthesized and pumped to your ear drums through the sound system. No thanks.

When it comes to driving excitement, I’d call it a tie – the pendulum will swing in favor of each respective car depending on your driving tastes.

“When it comes to driving excitement, I’d call it a tie…”

So the M5 is a little quicker, equally as exciting though a little more polished, and features better interior build-quality. It possesses a duality in spirit that leaves the CTS-V staring cross-eyed – a one-trick-pony. By those measures, it’s the clear winner in our books. But factor in the roughly $30,000 difference in sticker price, and we have a more complicated situation. I’d call it 90% of the performance, 80% of the polish and an equal match for fun and excitement. We must be ever-congnisant that $30k buys an awful lot of track time and R comp tires.

If you want a world-class sausage, buy a Bratwurst – but the Johnsonville Brats are on sale, and as juicy as ever.


M-Series.com Race Update: BMW Team RLL Finish Third and Fifth at Mid-Ohio

August 5, 2012

das

Bill Auberlen and Jörg Müller drove the No. 55 BMW Team RLL M3 GT to a third place GT class finish in today’s 2.45-hour American Le Mans Series Mid-Ohio Sports Car Challenge after starting the race from the pole position. The finish also netted the No. 55 M3 GT its second Michelin Green X Challenge trophy of the season. BMW Team RLL teammates Joey Hand and Dirk Müller finished fifth in the No. 56 M3 GT after starting from seventh.

The team’s fourth podium finish of the season keeps BMW second in Manufacturer points, 20 points behind Chevrolet. Hand and Müller, the 2011 class driver co-champions, move back to second in Driver points. Auberlen and Jörg Müller hold onto sixth place.

“With all the restrictions the series has placed upon us, and the freedoms they have given to the competition, we are just not fast enough, “said Bobby Rahal, Team Principal. “There is an obvious imbalance evident in the last few races and I hope that the ALMS will do the right thing. When you know you don’t have the pace you have to rely on strategy and luck. This week the Corvette had an incident and we got lucky again. We need to get back to fair and equal footing and give these guys a run for their money.”

See What Others Are Saying on LinkedIn About the Race:

http://www.linkedin.com/groups/BMW-Team-RLL-Finish-Third-2138385.S.142606731?qid=08562ffd-86e5-4b1a-a5c0-b847676ce233&goback=%2Egmp_2138385


M-Series.com Race Update: BMW Team RLL Finish Third and Fifth at Mid-Ohio

August 5, 2012

das

Bill Auberlen and Jörg Müller drove the No. 55 BMW Team RLL M3 GT to a third place GT class finish in today’s 2.45-hour American Le Mans Series Mid-Ohio Sports Car Challenge after starting the race from the pole position. The finish also netted the No. 55 M3 GT its second Michelin Green X Challenge trophy of the season. BMW Team RLL teammates Joey Hand and Dirk Müller finished fifth in the No. 56 M3 GT after starting from seventh.

The team’s fourth podium finish of the season keeps BMW second in Manufacturer points, 20 points behind Chevrolet. Hand and Müller, the 2011 class driver co-champions, move back to second in Driver points. Auberlen and Jörg Müller hold onto sixth place.

“With all the restrictions the series has placed upon us, and the freedoms they have given to the competition, we are just not fast enough, “said Bobby Rahal, Team Principal. “There is an obvious imbalance evident in the last few races and I hope that the ALMS will do the right thing. When you know you don’t have the pace you have to rely on strategy and luck. This week the Corvette had an incident and we got lucky again. We need to get back to fair and equal footing and give these guys a run for their money.”

See What Others Are Saying on LinkedIn About the Race:

http://www.linkedin.com/groups/BMW-Team-RLL-Finish-Third-2138385.S.142606731?qid=08562ffd-86e5-4b1a-a5c0-b847676ce233&goback=%2Egmp_2138385


M-Series.com Spied on The Street: BMW F80 M3

August 2, 2012

It will be called the F80 and it will probably be awesome. Before it happens though, there’s a lot of testing going on before it’s ready.

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

The folks at KGP Photography managed to snap a few shots of the F80 BMW M3 going through the desert testing stage. This is where the most important stress tests come in.

Death Valley has a way with dishing out the heat but when going through the desert in a turbocharged car with quite a lot of power.

Even if the testers go through the event with a little more common sense than us M3 freaks would if we had a chance at it, they’re still taking a chance with the prototype.

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

What is important about the F80 and the shots it was caught in this time is the fact that more of the front end was visible this time.

The lower part of the front bumper is more opened up than the F30 standard sedan which is understandable given the conditions and the need for improved cooling.

With these images the rear end of the F80 is also available. The sporty sedan looks a lot more like the sedan than the previous version.

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

F80 BMW M3 spyshot

Which could end up giving the new F80 BMW M3 a better chance at being a sleeper performance car rather than the obvious predecessor.